The Bare Naked TRUTH About 9-11

Thomas Jefferson (author of the Declaration of Independence)

-----------

These words mean as much today as when he said them...

So Thomas, I am speaking up -- even if I'm doing so with a shaky voice and trembling hands.

With the Patriot Act, NDAA Bill, and other draconian bills passing through Congress, Americans were stripped of many of the rights that they had prior to the events of 9/11.

--------

One of the first changes that was openly visible to the population at large, was the airport security measures before and after 9/11.

As my fellow Americans will know -- before the events of 9/11, citizens would merely have to step across a metal detector device to show that we were screened and ready to board the plane.

Following the events of 9/11, we are now given a choice to be x-rayed with a TSA body scanning device which reveals the human form as "naked"... or make the choice to be publicly humiliated by having a member of the TSA fondle us before boarding a plane.

Due to the many infringements on American's freedoms and liberties following the reported "terrorist attacks of 9/11", I reserve the right to question "The Official Story of 9/11".

As you will see from the upcoming video collection that I have posted within this hub page, there are numerous reasons to study and investigate the events of 9/11 much more thoroughly than our national news services did!

-----------

I don't mean to bring up a sore subject, but when a historic event has THIS MANY ramifications which effect millions of people's lives and freedoms... I really only think that it is fair to take the time to rehash the story and delve more deeply into a number of details which were obviously happening so fast that it would have been impossible for the news stations to have accurately separated fact from fiction.

There are "those days" that when you look back upon your life, you realize have a major impact on you throughout your life.

The list is extensive: your first bike and learning how to ride it; your first kiss; your first car; your Senior Prom; your High School Graduation; your first serious romance; your first job; your first home, meeting that friend that you've adored online for over 4 years for the first time-- in person, and feeling your heart go pitter patter as if this were the very day that you had your first kiss.

So many memories form and shape the way that we view our lives. These are the moments that forever make us "who" and "what" we are.

Looking back at 9/11...

If I were to ask each one of you exactly where you were and what you were doing when you learned about 9/11 for the first time, I'm sure that you would be able to give me a verbal account of the kodak moment that forever stands in your mind when you first heard of this tragedy and all of the many details that you can remember about this historic day.

------------

As an American with a deep love for my country-- and a tremendous respect for the men and women that died that day-- (and the thousands of family members that have mourned and survived them), I feel a huge responsibility to share the information that I have been researching this past three and a half years.

I know that this subject is quite controversial, but I feel that it is something that my soul has had a calling to research and to shed some light on.

Nights when the majority of people have been comfortably sleeping through the night, I've been driven to stay up and watch video after video of the many camera angles and stories which have amassed as a result of the events of 9/11. I am bringing you this message after a lot of soul searching and coming to terms with my initial hunches about 9/11 -- and what I feel was left uncovered by our media sources and journalists.

A lot of you are so busy that you don't have time to be "research hounds" pounding down the research rabbit holes non-stop. I have researched the best of THE BEST videos and links that I've found on these late night searches... and have documented these for you in this article. I'm giving you the Cliff Note Version of videos here in this article. You have 3 1/2 years of video searches at your finger tips. All you have to do is hit "play" and watch as these videos unravel the many unique findings of 9/11.

-------------

Why have I felt so compelled to research this? I've literally been "haunted" by this American tragedy. I felt a deep connection to the people who died this day and the family members who are mourning their loved ones. You see, I was raised in the funeral business and I know all too well what it sounds like and what it feels like to see people mourning those that they have loved. I've been to numerous funerals and I know what it is like to see people grieve the ones that they have lost.

Yes, it's been ten years now.

I know. Realistically-- I should just "let it go". Forget about it. Drop it. What's done is done. There's no way that I can possibly crack the case and make this appear any less of a fiasco than it already was.

People have the argument that you should "just let this rest"... but I feel that if I were one of the people who had died in this manner, I would want the truth to come to light. I would be one of those spirits that would haunt people like myself, day and night -- until they finally brought the truth to light.

----------

Who am I kidding? The "experts" obviously sewed this case up on the very day that this happened.

-----------

Right about here, my logical Nancy Drew side kicks in. I start evaluating that even the world's very best detectives-- such as Sherlock Holmes, Columbo, McMillan and Wife, Nancy Drew, and the Hardy Boys could not have pieced all of the information together as quickly as this story was unraveling on our TV's.

For heavens sake! How did the news piece together such an IMMEDIATE STORY?

Crime shows on TV take years to discover who killed someone, how did our media sources have all of the evidence to come up with an official story (within the very first 12 hours)?

But yet the media explicitly told us who did this and how the buildings fell -- WITHOUT any question.

---------

Ok, STOP!!!

Enough already!

I should just turn my attention to another story on the news... and MOVE ON!!!

Right?

---------------

Wrong.

---------------

For some reason, this story continues to haunt me like a huge ghost from my past. Why? Because I feel an obligation to share what I have researched in the memory of the people that died that day. And because I had an emotional attachment to the Twin Towers. I had some wonderful "one of those days" type moments in the buildings at the top of the towers.

Windows of the World, the restaurant at the top of the World Trade Center was the magical spot that I discovered on a day to explore NYC and see something to "write home about". As I raced towards the picture window to peer out of the glass, I had never seen such a beautiful city scape with all of the beautiful buildings and the Statue of Liberty in the distance.

This building had a number of "one of those days" type memories. It was also the place that I chose to celebrate my Grad School Graduation evening... dancing till the wee hours of the evening in the dance floor that spun round and round allowing you to see every angle of the dancing city lights and the sparkling view below.

There was an energy to the city that you can feel, it was similar to this song by Alicia Keys "Empire State of Mind"...

These buildings were more than just buildings to me, they were monuments proving how high the human spirit could soar. The sheer height of these buildings was a tribute to all of humankind's hopes and dreams. They were a symbol of the song "New York, New York"... if I can make it there, I'll make it anywhere, its up to you-- New York -- NEW YORK!!!

----------------

So, forgive me. But I took it rather personally the day that those buildings plummeted to the ground in under 15 seconds each.

Intuitively, I have always followed my hunches. I've trusted that if I am having a thought that won't let me sleep, then-- there must be something more to the story. Something that is hooking me in to want to pry it open and take more of a peek than what we were allowed to take the day the events took place.

In a number of ways, this story has been equivalent to opening Pandora's Box. Once the lid is open, it brings up a number of very dark things that you would probably have rather have kept hidden. But this is the process. You must open the lid, take a peek-- then shed light on it to dispel the darkness. This is at the core of every historically meaningful and great mystery.

Intuition can be the highest form of intelligence. You just have to learn to trust it and not block it. It will normally lead you where your soul is meant to be.

Regardless of the fact that this story brings up some depths of tremendous darkness-- my soul is very content to cover this story and to bring light to the subject.

9/11 was a day that put everyone's emotions into complete OVERDRIVE! So much so, that most people were too "shocked" to even raise logical questions about many details of the official story.

This was such a sensationalized catastrophe, supercharged with emotions. Events "exploded" at such a fast speed while the official story was shaping up.

What information is actually "TRUE" vs evidence that was possibly "planted to BE True"?

"Myths" without any basis of investigation or evidence emerged as "unquestionable truth". How do we really "know" that this was positively "TRUE"?

Let me first clarify that I am not a "conspiracy theorist" and I'm really not even a "9/11 Truther". And for heaven's sakes... I'm certainly NOT a "terrorist" (Homeland Security can RELAX... and move on to another suspect! I don't know how to load or handle a gun, I am not going to strap some dynamite under my wig or push-up padded bra and blow up anything. I value my handbags more than to want to risk scratching them, let alone having them explode in some type of ridiculous bombing incident! (LOL...)!

A watercolorist and karaoke singer is dangerous on paper and the stage... but certainly NOT a threat to National Security!!!

Good Heavens!!! [Don't EVEN Go There! K?]

-----------

My motive for exploring this topic and sharing this story...?

I am merely a concerned American Citizen who viewed the events of 9/11 as they unfolded on my home TV screen and had a number of questions which have been unanswered by our media sources and our country's leaders.

I'm not selling a book, I'm not trying to get you to buy a 9/11 Truth T-shirt, I'm not trying to get you to buy a video tape. I don't have an investment in the information that I'm sharing with you and I won't gain anything by swinging you to the side of questing the events of 9/11 and the official story.

The only possible benefit that I will receive would be to sleep better at night after having gotten this "off my chest" -- so to speak!

I have a background in advertising video editing, graphic design, art, and came in with a number of different intuitive skills that I really can't explain, but seem to give me accurate hunches on a number of issues. In studying the videos of 9/11 for countless hours, days, months, and years-- the visuals from the film footage were very haunting. I couldn't seem to shake the intuitive feeling that I was having. Something was wrong. Things were not as they were reported in our official story of 9/11.

-------------

Going back to the initial impressions that I had when I first learned that a plane had struck the first tower...

The very moment that I saw the planes strike the buildings, visually-- this took on a very surreal, contrived, and artificially theatrical image for me. My intuition was screaming at me that this was just "too Hollywood". The whole entire thing felt staged, from the way that the planes crashed into the building, to the camera angles that were being filmed in the streets, to the news announcers interviewing experts immediately giving us the entire story within a few hours, to the scenes of people running for their very lives-- and then seeing someone coming up to a reporter and film crew and standing as cool as a cucumber giving us a very detailed explanation that the buildings had fallen due to the fires burning so hot that it melted the structural steel (who does this type of thing in the middle of a major EMERGENCY?).

--------------

My initial impression was that this was an elaborate "entertainment production".

--------------

The intuition and creativity works in funny ways. You "get" things in a way that sometimes can't be explained in a logical manner, but it is meaningful just the same.

As soon as the second plane hit the building and I was coming to terms with the fact that my neighbor raced across the street to knock on my door and tell me to turn on the TV and that a plane had struck the first Twin Tower, my intuition was sending me the visual image of King Kong standing on top of the Empire State Building fighting off planes.

And when both towers plummeted, my first visual hunch was that this was looking all too similar to the videos that I had researched on controlled demolitions. The buildings fell in a manner that was explosive. Excuse my Texas colloquialism, but these buildings appeared to be "Blown to Smithereens"... [translation: disintegrated into small fragments by a sudden impact or explosion].

Nothing makes you question a journalistic story-- more than having the perspective of having studied journalism.

This would probably be like a surgeon who is faced with having to trust another surgeon to perform a major surgery on themselves or a loved one. The more that you know, the more that you are going to question the other professional. Right? It's just human nature!

-------------

As a freshman and sophomore in college, I studied journalism. It was always very interesting to see the results of over 30 people in a classroom giving their "story" of what happened in a basic journalism class exercise. I still remember the sound of all of these type writers clicking with a sound that buzzed through the air like hundreds of little woodpeckers pecking away.

Regardless of what the assignment was and which story we were supposed to write about -- each person in the class put their own "spin" on the story. No two stories ever told the same exact story. Journalist students would always choose to capitalize on their own interests and write their "story" based on what they felt was important. Kind of like a cooking class being given a recipe (without exact measurements) -- and given the assignment to bake their own cake out of the same list of ingredients. Each cook will use different measurements to come up with their own unique recipe of the dish. No two will ever be the same.

The entire journalistic exercise turned out to be very similar to the childhood game that we played called "gossip". You start with one story - and by the time the entire circle re-tells it, you have a completely different story!

Studying journalism (and creative writing) also gives you the insight into the fact that you are often having to write a story to meet the expectations of the instructor... or in the case of journalists working for hire, you are always in the position to write and tell your story in a manner that meets the the expectations of the news network that is cutting your paycheck.

In the event of a national news story which effects international relationships across the globe... (fill in the dots here). How much of the story could be truth - vs - something that is crafted to BE "True"?

--------------

Seeing each writer's "spin" on the story was equivalent to being an art student in your first nude model figurative class. The model disrobes and strikes a pose in the center of the room. Each art student sets up their easel and begins painting with their own perspective of the models curves, angles from a position that only they could envision, given the exact perspective and angle they were seeing the model and "view" from.

As you can imagine, the first time that you are in a class like this-- it is a bit awkward just getting over the fact that there is a nude person in the room-- and that art students are studying this nude person in their own position located about 10 feet away from the model by putting their thumbs up, checking to make sure that they are lining up the model appropriately on the canvas before them... making sure that the elbow is connected to the arm and then the shoulder-- rather than the knee!

After you get over that initial "shock", then -- later in the day... when you get to the critique, you quickly find that each person has a completely different painting. No two paintings are ever alike. Each artist has painted their own "spin on the story" (so to speak) given their unique perspective.

Tying the journalism and art lessons back into my story of 9/11-- an art class painting a bare naked figure model is a very good example of how each writer and journalist spins their own twist on a story. It is impossible to paint a picture from an angle that you are not seeing... just as it is impossible to tell a story from a perspective that you are not seeing.

-----------

Why am I mentioning "spins on the story" and the "angles that you view and paint your figurative models"? Because one of the first things that I noticed in my research of the videos of 9/11, was the fact that the American public was NOT privy to the same camera angles that were coming out in foreign countries. The BBC and Asian Channels were showing video footage that clearly indicated the explosives. The US broadcasting companies showed camera angles that didn't clearly show what was actually going on with the explosives and quibs firing out the windows of the buildings. It was only through extensive research and pulling up hours of film footage that I noticed the difference in what was conveyed over seas-- and what we were show more locally.

-------------

Other disciplines came into play to make me question the official story of 9/11.

Although college algebra was not my favorite courses, it taught some interesting lessons that can easily be applied to detective work and investigative journalism. One of the basic truths taught in algebra was that missing variables can be a very important part in finding the answer to the equation. Things that are NOT "a given" can be just as important as things that are stated to BE "a given". For example, the classic Sherlock Holmes mystery where an intruder enters the home, but the dog doesn't bark. Why didn't the dog bark? Could it be that the dog knew the intruder?

(A + B = C) If you are given enough of the equation, you can start figuring out the missing variable. 9/11 had a number of missing variables. 110 story buildings falling in less than 15 seconds, defies the laws of physics AND algebra... unless one of your variables happens to be "explosives" which equals a controlled demolition. (Think about it.)

And pulling statistics into this whole journalism analogy. It is critically important to analyze the probability of things when told in a major news story. What are the odds that something like this could even take place? What is the probability?

When you analyze the fact that there were three steel framed buildings that fell in NYC on 9/11. The Twin Towers-- AND-- Building #7. [Notice, there wasn't a lot of media coverage on Building #7, perhaps because it was a steel framed building that fell WITHOUT AN AIRCRAFT INVOLVED... so there is no way to put jet fuel into the equation.]

What are the odds that that building would fall in less than 7 seconds? Statistically, very rare! The ONLY way that this building could have fallen that fast would involve EXPLOSIVES (or possibly some type of directed energy weapon attack that the majority of the population is unaware exists ***See Dr. Judy Woods Videos on this theory***)!

Statistically, these are the only three steel frame constructed buildings to have fallen in a symmetrical fashion in the history of architecture. (Watch the Building #7 Video created by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth).

I was born a couple of weeks before Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech-- and a couple of months before JFK was assassinated. So, I was hearing "stories" from a very early age about all of the many questions around three of the most traumatic events in our country's recent history surrounding the death of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Junior, and Bobby Kennedy.

------------

In 2001, the events of 9/11 exploded in such a manner that it appeared to over shadow every known journalistic event before its time.

The record speed that this news story developed was amazingly suspicious. The major news networks had key "experts" ready to give a complete run down on many of these seemingly "unanswerable questions" that it would take months or even years for experts to determine.

When did these reporters, news anchors, and so called "experts" become the ultimate authority on architectural steel structured buildings? How can they immediately give a dignified comment on how these buildings fell?

When most people would have been in complete shock of the events of 9/11, how did these experts featured on TV know to head to the network studio that day -- so soon after these events occurred? (This in and of itself is majorly suspicious.)

One of the key "experts" gives his expert opinion on why he felt the buildings fell, and then shortly after this, he is suddenly an "expert" on Bin Laden? Very rarely does someone have that broad of a base to cover two unrelated subjects with ultimate authority.

-----------

My hunches are, there are just too many details of this "story" which appear to be contrived. There are way too many coincidences for this to have just played out in this manner without someone pulling some puppet stings behind the scenes.

------------

With this in mind, I would like to be able to air some of my own questions about this historic event... and hopefully help others discover the many pieces of the journalistic "official story" which very clearly -- do NOT appear to add up.

When you first enter your figurative art class (figurative = nude model painting/drawing course), most teachers have you warm up by doing a quick 5-10 minute exercise where you work on gesture drawings that capture the whole model on the page in less than 30 seconds or one minute. This discipline causes art students to stop focusing on the intricacies of painting every hair or quibbling about how to paint a nose, hand, or foot-- and forces them to capture the general essence of what they are seeing in front of them.

As an artist, when you are painting your figurative portraits-- sometimes, it helps to stand back from your painting and look at it from a different perspective. (If you keep working on the intricate details for too long, you can become myopic). You occasionally need to step back from the canvas and see your painting in a new light.

-------------

In other words... sometimes it is best to gain a "bird's eye view" of information. Take a look at the whole forest, before you examine the individual trees. This allows you to gain a better perspective of exactly what you are dealing with.

--------------

The upcoming video is a comedic spoof which basically allows the viewer to see the forest before the trees. It outlines the many events that happened to make up the official story of 9/11 over a 10 year period.

This story is often so clouded with emotion that it totally BAMBOOZLES you! You get caught up in all of the people who have died, all of the families who have lost loved ones... and then you can't rationally see the story for what it really is. A "convoluted MESS"!

----------------

The video does the same thing that the quick figurative gesture exercises does in an art class. It strips a lot of the emotion out of the events that happened on 9/11 and just states the details as if the announcer were reading a non-stop, extremely fast -- 5 minute teleprompter. Going back to my title and figurative painting example... this video gives you the "bare naked facts" about 9/11.

---------------

Do me a favor...

Please watch this video objectively (without any judgments). See what your general impressions are about the story in its entirety. Try to remain emotionally detached from the details of the story, and try to remain in a space of non-judgment on anything that you hear in the story. Just listen to the story, as if you were hearing this news for the very first time.

How uncanny are these multiple "coincidences" that happened that historic and fateful day? And look at all of the many unbelievable "coincidences" that continue to happen over the next ten year period! Uncanny, isn't it?

When I first saw this video and witnessed all of the many details of the official story of 9/11 -- it reads like a complete joke! Who would believe this?

[I don't even think that you would take a movie of the week serious, if there were this many unbelievable "coincidences"].

Both President George W. Bush, as well as Obama made official recorded speeches which were aired to the public clearly addressing the issue that people should not question the "official story of 9/11".

[I tried to pull up the speeches on this, but for some reason each time I tried -- there was a broken link. If you are wanting to see these speeches for yourself, google > Obama Warns To Not Question the Official Story of 9/11. The first link that pops up under this will give you both Obama and George W's speech on this topic.]

-----------

Now, if either of them knew ANYTHING about child psychology (or adult psychology, for that matter)... the LAST THING that you want to do is to make a bold statement NOT to do something. Why? Because that is exactly what any kid is going to want to do. Right? This would turn even the most sissy kid into a mischievous little imp, just to find out "why" you said DON'T do something.

It is exactly like telling a kid, don't open the cookie jar on top of the refrigerator. Then pretty soon you see little Johnny blazing a trail and busting a gut to get to the top of the refrigerator to open the "forbidden cookie jar".

------------

If the story were completely rock solid and didn't have a number of major holes in it, there wouldn't need to be this type of public announcement about it. They would actually welcome you to research this topic and would try to help you in any way find the information that you were seeking. They would joyfully open a new investigation of this topic knowing that it would help to resolve a number of questions that the public has about this topic. Right?

-------------

Obviously, they were advising this for a clear reason. (I'll let YOU connect the dots on this one! K?).

Nothing brings out my "inner Nancy Drew" and "raises the detective radar" faster than the unexamined events of 9/11.

------------

Years after 9/11, I was still losing sleep piecing together all of the many unexplained details. There were several mysteries that had me scratching my head, trying to make sense out of illogical stories which were immediately spoon fed to us by our news medias. Each of these anomalies have been great source of intrigue.

[These were the glaringly OBVIOUS questions that initially puzzled me and caused me to question the news story as it was unraveling at record speed. These stories were so compelling that it caused me to begin an extensive research into the "facts" behind 9/11...

-------------

(Exhibit A): The Twin Towers collapsed (at almost FREE FALL SPEED), materializing into dust: How does a "FIRE" do this?

The visuals of the two planes striking the twin towers were very haunting. However this was quickly over-shadowed by the images of both buildings as they exploded and raced to the ground in less than 15 seconds each (almost at free fall speed). What was more of a mystery, was the fact that both buildings materialized into thin dust standing only a few stories tall. Where did all of this building material go?

Examining this further, these buildings fell less than two hours after the impact of the planes flew into them which is rather ironic. These THREE Buildings that fell that day, are the only steel framed constructed buildings to have collapsed in this manner - in the history of steel framed building construction. There are steel high rises that burn for days and NEVER collapse (forgive me, I wasn't a complete "ACE at math", but this information is completely blowing the concepts that I learned in my basic statistics course).

My initial hunch when I first saw the newscast videos of this was... *haven't I just seen this in videos of Las Vegas controlled demolitions?*

[How do you explain this WITHOUT the use of EXPLOSIVES?]

-----------

Exhibit B: Building #7 - the third building that collapsed that day, collapses in under seven seconds (HELLO!!! This Building Was NOT EVEN Hit by a Plane!!!!)

Building #7, the 3rd building that fell to the ground that day-- self destructed (and collapsed into a pile of dust) all within less than seven seconds. (There were only a few floors burning in that particular building. Like I said before-- this building was NOT EVEN HIT BY A PLANE so you can't rationalize that this involved "jet fuel" which caused the building to explode and burn to the ground at record speed!)

As a detective, this building is "the smoking hot gun".

[How can you explain this?]

------------

Exhibit C: The "Miraculous Passport"

What a lucky fluke that they were able to find a terrorist's passport amid the pulverized dust of the twin towers! Amazing!!! Especially when you consider that there wasn't even a porcelain toilet, wooden desk, or copy machine that survived intact-- but yet this "Miracle Passport" survived a plane flying into the towers and jet fuel burning at a level that supposedly caused the buildings to collapse!

What a LUCKY Break! This major piece of evidence helped us to immediately KNOW who did this!

[ Could this have possibly been "planted" in the rubble? ]

------------

Exhibit D: The Pentagon building hole that could NOT have been caused by the nose of a plane...

When I saw the pictures and videos of the entrance hole of the aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon, this was another detail that really "raised my radar"! Why is there only a hole for the body of the airplane, but not a visible hole for the wingspan? Where the heck did the wings go (did they fold down like a toy paper airplane?). These were made of metal construction, weren't they?

[Plane? (Funny, but this hole looks more like a Missile actually hit the building).]

------------

Exhibit E: Skill level of the pilot could NOT have hit the Pentagon at this angle going at that rate of speed.

Analyzing the skill of the pilot was another question altogether. How can a pilot who can barely fly a small plane manage to maneuver a huge commercial plane into the Pentagon? According to records of this particular pilots flying experience and his difficulty maneuvering a smaller aircraft the week prior to 9/11, how can he miraculously fly a huge commercial plane like this into the Pentagon at this angle?

[This is more than a little bit suspicious, I would say.]

------------

Exhibit F: Body language and actions of President are NOT congruent with a REAL "Terrorist Attack"...

The video footage of President George W.'s face was also an unforgettable image. Heck, if I had just been told that we were under some type of major "terrorist attack" that had resulted in two airplanes flying into The World Trade Center and the Pentagon being hit, I would have been high tailing it out of the children's elementary school engagement. Instead, he sat through the full reading of a story about a goat-- then he hung out an additional 30 minutes for a photo opportunity!

[What??? Shouldn't the Secret Service have dashed him to safety!!! As President of the United States, wasn't he a prime target for an additional terrorist attack?]

------------

Exhibit G: Stock options purchased created millions of dollars for those with this insight...

Upon further study, when I realized that there were individuals who had the foresight to have purchased stock option "puts" on two specific airlines, (American and United).... this story REALLY began to look contrived. How would they have known to have placed stock options on the very two airlines that were going to take quite a stock tumble after the events of 9/11 played out? Some of these stock transactions were taking place as early as August the 6th, more than a month BEFORE 9/11.

[PLEASE: Get me the number to their psychic, I want a reading!]

----------

Each one of these individual details has been a form of amusement which has led me to delve into the study of this topic and spend countless hours analyzing the many details that we were spoon fed by our media sources.

The Nancy Drew part of me has wanted to resolve all of the many questions because this has been a virtually unexamined case.

Isn't it time to have an official investigation into this historic event that forever changed World History?

When I've raised this question within discussions in internet chat rooms, the general consensus is that there is way too much "emotional pain" to even rehash the story.

The emotional context with this magnitude of disaster put this story into the realm of "sacred ground". It was frowned upon to even formally discuss or question all of the many events that were unraveling on the news stations that day. Assumptions and speculations became "Fact"-- without research and data to prove their validity.

---------

I'm sorry, but I'm NOT Ok with "the Official Story of 9/11". I'm not the type of person to just sit and keep my mouth shut when I know that something needs to be hashed out.

Yes, I value the emotional feelings of all of the people who experienced the pain and loss of loved ones, but I honestly and truly believe that the people who died that day are being given a HUGE disservice to NOT discuss and investigate all of the many events that are extremely bogus and questionable surrounding the details of the events of 9/11.

---------

So, moving forward...

Here are the reasons "why" I have questioned the "Official Story of 9/11"...

These buildings collapsed and literally exploded into dust. Yet the original story planted the information that jet fuel reached a burning point that caused the buildings to collapse.

[How does a fire do this?]

--------------

Viewing the video tapes, you see a couple of towers standing over 110 stories tall which explode into dust and hit the ground in under 15 seconds, start to finish.

Free Fall ---- BaBANG!!!

Free Fall ---- BaBANGGGGG!!!

The fact of the matter is both towers pancaked at a rate and speed that defied all known laws of physics (WITHOUT the use of explosives). [This eliminates the whole "fire theory" that we were first told by our news sources.]

As I mentioned earlier, Building #7 is the smoking hot gun in this whole mystery. Why? Because in examining how this building fell, you can more easily see how the Twin Towers fell in under 15 seconds each.

(With all of the many details that were reported that day, very few people are aware that a third building fell that day).

Building #7 was a 47 story building that housed the NYC Mayor's office and CIA/FBI offices. (Oddly enough, it was the very building that housed a great deal of the evidence dealing with the Enron and Worldcom cases). Keep in mind, this particular building was NOT EVEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE (so there is NO WAY that jet fuel could have been involved in the equation of how fast the building fell). However, Building #7 plummeted to the ground in less than 7 seconds flat.

Time this if you will, please...

7 (1000)

6 (1000)

5 (1000)

4 (1000)

3 (1000)

2 (1000)

1 (1000)...

BaBang!!!

------

[How can this be?]

After viewing dozens of videos of the events of 9/11, I have posted some of the most convincing videos that I found which reveal a number of flaws in the "Official Story of 9/11". Our news story announcements came about so quickly that there was no time to have formulated true research with facts and data. This leads me to believe that the original story may indeed be more fiction, than fact.

----------------

View these upcoming videos...

Examine each video. Look for the explosions (called "quibs" in the demolition industry), the building materials pulverizing into dust, and the steel beams ejecting. [One thing is for sure, this building is falling at a rate and speed which is definitely NOT due to a FIRE!!!]

Remember the classes that taught you how to prepare for taking College Entrance Exams? One of the first things that they taught us, was to go with our first hunch. Don't think about it too much-- don't read into it. Just go with your initial hunch.

Ok, if I were following this advice on the 9/11 Events, my hunches were that the buildings fell due to an explosion. This looked all too similar to the other videos and films that I had seen of buildings that have been rigged to explode and bring buildings down in a controlled demolition.

I'm not the only one who had this impression. A number of news announcers blurted their impressions out as well, stating exactly what they were witnessing-- that this looks exactly like an old building being blown up; a demolition.

-------------

How else can you explain the physics defying rate in which these buildings fell to the ground? I mean, these towers were both over 111 stories tall. How can a building of that height fall in less than 14 seconds WITHOUT the use of some type of explosive?

Did you see explosives cascading down the buildings as if they were on a string of fire crackers? There are countless stories of eye witnesses who give accounts of explosives going off in both towers and in Building #7, this video confirms that.

[What? Do they want us to believe that these buildings fell like a free fall avalanche -- and NOT question what happened?]

As an artist and someone with a background in advertising, video editing, graphic design, and photography -- I can't deny what the visual information is telling me as I watch these videos.

-----------

The initial hunch that I had as I watched this has never left me. It has become a haunting image in my mind that has prompted me to speak up and break the silence. (Believe me, it would have been a LOT Easier to have never brought this subject up). But this topic is something that I feel is a very important part of our American and World History.

--------

Witnessing the explosions on the news casts were the initial details that raised my suspicions of 9/11 and the primary reason why I delved into over 3 years of study on this topic. There are laundry lists of other questionable details that are explored on the videos that I have posted. Each questionable detail reveals that there is much more to the official story than what the news and media first reported to us.

--------

I've watched dozens of videos on this particular topic, these are the best videos that I have seen that led me to the belief that 9/11 deserves a FULL Investigation.

Listen to the first interviews which were taken shortly after experiencing the events of 9/11. Each of these videos give the impression that there were explosives used.

These upcoming videos all use the terms "explosion(s)", hearing the sound "boom, boom, boom, boom..."

It doesn't take an artist to figure out that you need to examine the color of the planes, compared to the alleged airlines that supposedly hit the Twin Towers (American and United).

The color of the planes gave this away.

---------

Where are the logos?

Where are the windows in a commercial plane?

For heaven's sake... the plane that struck the tower is grey (listen to this upcoming video: the eyewitnesses described this as a "grey plane") -- it isn't even the same color of an American or United Airline plane!

What the heck?

----------

The color of this plane was not even congruent with the two suspected airlines that supposedly crashed into the World Trade Center (American and United).

Airlines spend millions of dollars making sure that their logos and identifiable markings are visible to identify their particular airline fleets.

The eyewitnesses who were witnessing this were reporting that these were "NOT commercial planes"!!! A number of them said that this plane did not have windows and looked to be a "military plane".

(Check out the google pics of these airlines and see for yourself!)

This was a piece of the puzzle that I didn't realize until after studying a number of different facets of 9/11. However, the insider trading on 9/11 stands out to me as something that is THE MOST SUSPICIOUS activity that happened around 9/11.

Why? Because whomever placed these stock option puts on both American and United Airlines, would have clearly had to have had advanced knowledge of the exact two planes that would be reported to have flown into the World Trade Center buildings. Some of these trades were made as early as August 6th... over a month and a couple of days BEFORE the events of 9/11.

Watch these upcoming videos and see for yourself.

------------

UNBELIEVABLE!!! Right?

The first film that I posted, forces you to see the official story in its entirety where you are having to see the full scope of what happened throughout a ten year period, in under less than five minutes.

The second series of videos show the explosive cutter charges cascading down the buildings -- leading you to believe that these buildings were a part of a controlled demolition designed to explode the buildings.

The third series of videos covers the fact that you have eye witnesses which saw the events unfolding and gave their unedited first responses... without any tele-prompters, and without someone handing them a script placing words in their mouth. (They each use the term "explosives" and say sounds that sound like a bomb, such as "boom boom boom boom").

The fourth video shows the fact that the plane that hit the Twin Tower was not even the same color as the two suspected airlines (American and United). The google links give you a very clear idea of what these planes look like, and the plane that struck the building is not even in the same ballpark with the commercial airlines planes, logo designs, colors, and does not even have commercial grade passenger windows.

Why are the American and United Airlines Planes so significant? Because this was what was released as "the Official Story of 9/11". Whomever planned this "story" was able to identify the very two (2) planes that would supposedly fly into the World Trade Centers on 9/11. The stock option puts were placed as early as August 6th... over a month and a couple of days prior to the events of 9/11. Over 15 Billion (BILLION) dollars were made off these "insider trades".

There were several reasons why I chose these particular films for this article. The main reason that I chose this first film was because I really liked the video footage of the family members from 9/11 speaking up and stating that it was important to investigate the events that happened surrounding building #7 and the Twin Towers. I also like the fact that this film showed video footage of many different camera angles which give you a perspective of seeing the explosive nature of the buildings as they collapsed at almost free-fall speed.

This has some important interviews with eyewitnesses. There is a lot of information on this film.

This film also has some great film clips which tell "more of the story" than what we actually heard in the official story of 9/11. This also shows the subtle differences between a controlled demolition and other forms of explosions and building collapses.

-------

The second film starts with the information about the vans that were coming and going early in the mornings before the 3rd of September. It also goes into the fact that there were numerous auditory recordings and videos stating that bombs were going off in the buildings. It also has interview and audio recordings of the people who were experiencing the bombs in the lower levels of the Twin Towers far removed from the fires that were happening floors above due to the airplanes colliding into the buildings.

It goes into more detail on the nano thermite and other explosives. The video footage is very clear. One clip shows the steel girders which were found impaled in a building over two football fields away from the towers. Fire doesn't do this, guys. This happened due to an explosion.

Whew!!! What a relief it was to finally find some other people who also questioned the events of 9/11. This is fairly isolating information at first, because it runs counter to what the general consensus has been.

There are over 1400 Architects and Engineers who also question some of the events of 9/11. Richard Gage AI, created the group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. His group has a website which features all of the technical aspects of "why" this story should require a more thorough investigation into the events of 9/11.

In beginning any investigating into the many events of 9/11 -- it is imperative to sort "Fact" from "Fiction".

What parts of the official media story were spoon fed to us by BEFORE a proper investigation could be conducted to positively, without a doubt, give us rock solid evidence that this indeed "IS a Fact"?

The sheer speed with which the events were unraveling has made me question the "official story" that was reported to us by our news sources. [ How on God's green earth could all of the pieces have been pulled together THAT F-A-S-T?]

If I were playing Nancy Drew, and were following my initial hunches, I couldn't help but look at the many unbelievable details of the original story of 9/11 and examine what happened that very day.

Wow!!!

What more could they have packed into a day, than what played out all within a mere 12 hour time frame?

[Is it just me? Or - is this story completely "OVER THE TOP"?]

-------------------

The Synopsis:

Allow me to recap the laundry list of events that I remember unraveling on the news that day. (This list may be slightly out of order, so forgive me... but these were the events as I remember them playing out that day.)

[Keep in mind: I'm not making light of the situation, I'm just trying to state this in an unemotional way where I can allow you to see what a ridiculous story this whole thing is!]

--------------

Here we go:

* An airplane hit one of the World Trade Center Towers (What a bozo! Why was this plane flying this close to the city?)*

* Frantic footage of people on the streets of NYC shocked by the events (1st impression, doesn't this look exactly like the extras on a Batman or Superman film pointing up to the sky watching to see what horrendous crime a villain just committed?)*

* A second airplane flew into the other tower at The World Trade Center (Oops, this first plane was NOT just a random bozo who couldn't fly... Something is SERIOUSLY "UP"!)*

* Thousands of people were running for their lives to escape the buildings*

* Hundreds of people trapped in the upper stories of the World Trade Center Buildings making the choice to jump to their deaths or to be engulfed by flames*

* First Response Firemen, Policemen, etc. are called in to rescue people and manage the situation*

* Camera positions zero in and allowed you to see "the jumpers" *

* The South Tower falls*

* Frantic video footage of people's reactions to the events*

* Random interviews with people on the street who appear to be calm, even though others around them are running for their lives.*

* The North Tower falls*

* More random interviews with people on the city streets, again -- people frantically racing for their lives while a couple of people stop to "chat it up" with the interview cameras while appearing to remain as "cool as a cucumber"*

* A story emerges that terrorists on planes hijacked the planes full of people who fought hijackers with box cutters (Huh? How did these guys manage to sneak by airport security with box cutters, I can't even carry toenail clippers without having security take them out of my carry on?)*

* The Pentagon was hit by a plane*

* Another plane landed in a field (speculation was made that this plane was probably going after another major target like the White House or Statue of Liberty)*

* Story about cell phone calls to loved ones telling them bye (my cell never works on a plane, what service do they have? Sign me up!)*

* President Bush at an Elementary School listening to a story about a pet goat (why does this NOT surprise me?). Video camera later captures one of his secret service guys whispering in his ear two separate times. Rather than dashing for his life, George W. stays for a photo opportunity*

* Newscast interviews with key people who were already announcing how the buildings fell and who was involved in this terrorist plot (lucky for us, this story came together quickly enough to help us sleep better that night)*

* Building #7 (that housed the NYC Mayor's office, FBI, and CIA offices) plummeted to the ground in less than 7 seconds flat*

* Terrorist pictures already appearing on national TV identifying the guilty terrorists involved*

* Images of a terrorist group hanging out in the back caves of Afghanistan wearing checkered towels on their heads planning the entire story that played out that day (Send in the Navy Seal Sniper Team AND The Fashion Police! STAT!!!)*

* Images of the alleged terrorists groups doing random military type exercises*

* ALL USA airplanes were completely grounded. People were stuck in Airports all over the country waiting to fly home, to business meetings, etc.*

* Video footage shown of the throngs of people in the Middle East celebrating what had happened*

* President Bush arriving back at the White House (if he were really convinced that we were under a REAL Terrorist Attack, don't you think that he could have splurged on a hotel room that evening?-- The LAST place that I would have wanted to be, would have been at the White House, possibly a prime target for another random "Terrorist Attack").*

--------------

How crazy is this?

All of this was just so surreal!!! I mean, can you imagine all of the information that we were bombarded with in less than 12 hours? Each one of these major events could be a news story that ran for a complete month or more on their own, but on this particular day-- we were slammed with all of this information!!!

Mind Blowing!!!

Lucky for us, information was "planted" in our news stories that immediately gave us the answer to "who dun it"!!!

------------

What???

------------

Within less than 8 Hours, they were already pointing the finger to Bin Laden, showing pictures of the terrorists who boarded the planes, they had already determining that the jet fuel had caused the buildings to collapse, blah blah blah blahhhhhhhh.

How did they manage to come up with this whole scenario -- THIS F- A - S -T ???

(Hello!!!???... this was the first clue that this whole thing was possibly completely "contrived". There were just too many "coincidences".)

Could this have been, possibly, (hmmmmmmmmmm) STAGED???

The very fact that all of this "story" was manufactured SOOOOOOOO FAST, is a true indication that we were being spoon fed an elaborately crafted fabrication.

WAIT A MINUTE: Are you telling me that Fox News, the BBC, and MSNBC announced the collapse of Building 7 BEFORE IT FELL?

Yep.

Exactly.

---------------

Holy Cow!!!

Well, this is just sheer "Luck"... or these reporters must be our Psychic Friends!

How did they know that Building #7 was going to Fall?

---------

Could they have been handed a script and this message was recorded BEFORE they realized that they had goofed?

---------

Smoke BEFORE the building collapses? Check out this upcoming video... there is smoke BEFORE the building falls down. Folks, this can ONLY be a "Controlled Demolition"!

There were three separate news cast announcements which all happened BEFORE building #7 fell to the ground. How did each of these three separate news casters KNOW that Building #7 was going to plummet BEFORE the building actually fell?

Hmmmmmm.... could this have been "a controlled demolition"?

Yeah!!! Looks like it!

-----------

To confirm this, let's listen to what Larry Silverstein (the owner of the three buildings that collapsed on 9/11) had to say...

This was a video that I stumbled across after exploring the footage of Building #7.

Larry Silverstein was the new owner of the World Trade Center complex who had just taken out an extensive multi billion dollar insurance policy on the twin towers buildings. (He owned all three buildings that fell that day).

According to a number of sources, Silverstein had a regular business meeting at the top of the World Trade Center building for breakfast every morning without fail. Amazingly, on 9/11-- he did not arrive for his standard breakfast, but instead had a doctors appointment.

----------

I watched this video several times and each time I saw it, I was a bit suspicious of the words that he used. He states very clearly that he gave the orders to "Pull It"-- which are specialized words used in controlled demolitions that mean to go ahead and demolition the building.

He doesn't mix words here. He is very clear.

"Pull it!"

(Listen for yourself.)

This day was packed with so many unbelievable incidents that it has taken over 10 years for some of these stories to emerge in a way where you can see the many different facets of what actually played out that day.

Here are some upcoming videos that delve into stories which were not that well covered on 9/11, but began emerging on the internet... or I was referred to them by others who were delving into the research of 9/11.

Nine hundred and forty guests were checked in at the Marriott Hotel which was located across the street from the World Trade Center buildings. This upcoming video is a documentary on the different stories that were recorded on this documentary video.

I had not really delved into the events of the Oklahoma City bombing until seeing the new documentary that was recently released called "The Nobel Lie".

This documentary gives some amazing parallels of what actually happened to the "Official Story of the Oklahoma City Bombing" as compared with the "Official Story of 9/11". When I saw this film, I was really shocked by the many ways the national news changed the original story that the local news stations were reporting in Oklahoma.

I strongly feel that every American should see this.

After several years of researching this topic, these are the best video sources that I have found on this topic. Each of these three people have dedicated a great portion of their lives to seeking the TRUTH of 9/11, and reporting it to the best of their ability.

David Ray Griffin does a fabulous job of listing the key discrepancies with the official story and the events that actually played out that day.

Richard Gage goes into his information from the architecture and engineering perspectives.

Dr. Judy Woods questions the way in which the buildings fell, the cars that appeared to be "toasted".

All three of these videos go into much more analysis of why there is reasonable doubt that the events of 9/11 played out as they were announced on our news stations.

-----------

Grab some popcorn and your beverage of choice! Some of these are longer than others, but each video stands on its own with convincing material which has led me to the point where I am questioning the official story of 9/11.

Remember watching the old Herman the Munster shows? Do you remember how he would walk through a wall and would EVEN leave a clear outline of his body and the bolts in his neck? This seems to be so elementary, but when an object moves through another object-- it will leave its imprint! Right?

------------

The photos are not synchronized with the story here... (what's wrong with this picture?)??? This is a question that has really had me going from the git-go of this whole Pentagon Plane Crash scenario.

The official story says that a plane hit the pentagon. If so, then why do the photos from the Pentagon not show the wing span of the entire plane as it entered the building? The photos that I have seen, (so far) have looked as if there was a missile that struck the building. It left NO WING MARKS on the building, in any form that is detectable by the human eye. (What, did they fold up like a paper airplane?... This is ridiculous!).

The initial feeling that I had while watching the videos haunted me and kept me awake night after night trying to figure out the details of the day that forever changed our American and World History.

No matter how many times I watched the events of 9/11 play out on the TV news channels or videos that I would pull up, I could not forget the initial feeling that I felt that these buildings exploded and turned to dust before my very eyes.

Ted Gunderson openly admits the previous attacks on the World Trade Center involved inside personnel. He goes on to say that he believes that 9/11 was an "Inside Job" based on the history of attacks on the World Trade Center prior to the events of 9/11. He also disclosed the fact that there are a number of other agencies that have the surveillance technology to have tracked such suspected "terrorist activities" and that a great number of people would have known about the events of 9/11 BEFORE they occurred.

When asked if the President would have known about this... (watch the video and see his response).

In examining the videos of George W. Bush and analyzing his choice of words and body language, I'm left with this sneaky suspicion that he knew much more about the events of 9/11, than someone who was innocently listening to a goat story in an elementary classroom. He makes some very interesting statements captured on these upcoming videos.

What did he know, before the events of 9/11?

Looking back on the significance of the events of 9/11 and what happened as a result of these "terrorist attacks", the United States quickly became involved in two overseas wars with Afghanistan and Iraq.

Al Qaeda was supposedly hiding out in the back hills of Afghanistan so I understood why we may have ventured into that particular country... but the attacks on Iraq left me scratching my head, particularly after investigating the video tapes by both Bush and Cheney where they both admit that Iraq had nothing to do with the events of 9/11.

This is when it becomes valuable to review historical videos where both parties can be held accountable for their exact wording on these comments.

With all due respect, let President Bush and Vice President Cheney explain this, in their own words. (I couldn't make this stuff up, they actually say this with their own mouth and voice)...

Well, it would certainly be worth your time to watch each of these four upcoming videos, which explain that the United States basically created Al-Qaeda.

The first video goes into more of an in-depth explanation of this. The videos with Hillary explain this in her own words.

Due to the sensitive emotional context of this story, there are many questions and details of the events of 9/11 which have been left unanswered. Our country has not been allowed to officially "question" this topic in a professional investigation.

---------------

This is a VERY Tough Subject to Bring Up Without Ruffling Feathers:

When I have mentioned this topic in social circles and internet chat threads -- many people immediately jump to the conclusions that this is a story that should NOT be discussed or reopened. They almost "put you on a guilt trip" for even bringing the subject up, acting as if you are irreverent and claiming that you are offending and hurting the feelings of the families and loved ones who were lost that day. But it is my belief that if I were one of the people who had died in that catastrophe, my soul would not rest easy until there was an extensive investigation into the events that led up to 9/11, and what played out that entire day.

I am writing this from the perspective to honor those that lost their lives in the events that played out on 9/11. It is my wish that there should be an official investigation into everything that happened.

----------

Lets face it, this was a tremendously painful day that has managed to shape our entire world history. Let us not forget that this event was the incident that led us into two overseas Wars as well as bringing about the Patriot Act (where our internet and phone lines are being scrutinized by Homeland Security Specialists) and completely new airport security measures which now turn a random plane boarding into an "Almost Sexually Explicit Fondling Encounter" that the majority of modest and conservative people would not even encounter on a 2nd or 3rd date!

Financially, this event has cost Americans billions of dollars. It will take decades to recover from the financial aspects of this major catastrophe. Not to mention the whole "Feng Shui" of having these buildings plummet smack dab in the middle of the American's Greatest Financial District!

As far as the initial reports of the NIST Investigation, according to my sources -- the investigation that they conducted only led up to the events that happened BEFORE the collapse of the buildings. It never considered the reasons why the buildings fell so fast. This leaves a LOT of the case to be investigated further.

As you can see by the video, this experiment shows that people will eventually conform to the group that they are around, even though they may believe otherwise.

This is important when considering the "Official Story of 9/11" because a number of people may go along with this story simply based on group think... rather than standing firm to their own initial hunches and opinions.

Why am I questioning the "Official Story of 9/11"? Because I've seen an entire "transformation" of the American way of life after this event took place. Many of these changes are direct result of the fear of outside terrorism which was reported in the official story of 9/11.

(This upcoming video features a number of different newscast presentations on the many ways that Americans have lost their freedoms which were held before the events of 9/11. I have not had time to fully research the "Anonymous Movement"-- so I don't condone the last comments on this video... but feel that the newscast comments are worth watching because they address the full scope of the freedoms that have been given up by Americans since the events of 9/11).

Without a formal investigation into the events of 9/11, we are left wondering if the reports that were first documented by our media were indeed "Fact"-- or merely "Fiction".

9/11 stands as one of THOSE days that will always bring up a number of complicated questions. It is a subject that continues to bring up question after question. The more that I have researched this topic, the more I find different research rabbit holes that need to be explored. It is a truly extensive and intriguing topic.

How can they let this go-- without doing a full investigation?

This defies all common logic!

--------------

We knew enough to go to war, but never went to court.

[How can this be?]

At least they are not waiting several years later to begin raising all of the many contradictory details of the "official story" of the Bin Laden death.